TenIchi Mart
A redesign of the web delivery and pick up order experience for a Japanese grocery store in Williamsburg, Brooklyn.
DURATION
2 Weeks
MY ROLE
Design: Lo-fi wireframes, information architecture, hi-fi prototype
Research: User interviews, affinity mapping, user flows, card sorting, competitive analysis, and prototype testing
✨Short on time? Click here to skip to the final prototype and next steps✨
Overview
The problem: TenIchi’s current website lacks visual appeal, does not include an accurate representation of their inventory, and only allows users to place orders for delivery. Businesses that do not have a fully operational online presence are missing out on market share due to the prevalence of website and app orders.
The solution: My solution was a website that allows users to place orders for pick up and delivery directly from the mart. Based on the feedback from user interviews and tests, specific features affecting quality control, saved payments, and reduced waste were built into each of the two ordering experiences.
About TenIchi
TenIchi Mart is a Japanese grocery store and deli with two locations in Brooklyn - one in Cobble Hill, and one in Williamsburg. They offer ready to eat meals, grocery items, as well as some household, beauty, and stationary goods.
Challenge
Remote work and online ordering has increasingly become the norm for many New Yorkers. The ability to work from home or for a company that supports a hybrid model means that more people will be eating and shopping locally, whereas they previously would have been patrons of businesses closer to their office. The market is missing a huge opportunity to reach potential customers if it does not have an online presence.
Page layouts were inconsistent, misaligned, & outdated
Listed inventory did not reflect current mart offerings, even though it seems that checkout feature is fully functioning [I’m honestly not sure what I would received if I placed an order, if anything at all!]
The incomplete nature of the website does not instill trust or project a professional image
The general aesthetics of the page are not particularly appealing to users, especially when compared against other competitors such as Whole Foods [who is also in the neighborhood].
In order to design the best delivery and pick up ordering experience possible, I needed to understand who our users are and what needs and frustrations they have.
Meet The Users!
I interviewed 3 people who order groceries and food via the phone. Each interview had a duration of approximately 10-20 minutes each. One interviewee was already a customer of TenIchi and the other two users regularly shop at Asian grocery stores. Through these interviews, I aimed to learn more about their online ordering habits and any potential motivating or discouraging factors.
Some users had a sensitivity to packaging & waste
All users felt delivery estimates were important, both being provided them prior to ordering and accuracy after ordering
Search and filter functions must work well
Quality of food and produce was a concern
Convenience and ease of use is important
Creating Personas
Using my affinity map as a guide, I was able to extract two distinct user personas, each with different wants & needs: Conscious Consumer and Delivery Dependent.
Problem Statements
Delivery Dependent: This user needs a consistent, quick, easy, and reliable online ordering and delivery experience on the store's website.
Conscious Consumer: This user needs an in-store pick up experience from the store's website that minimizes waste and gives the user control of the product/produce that is selected.
Solutions
Delivery Dependent - Features that support speed and reliability for delivery:
Saved Profiles with all info to save time at checkout
Live order tracking & updates
Recommended items on feature pages based on items frequently bought together and also impulse items at checkout
Conscious Consumer - Features that support sustainability and quality control for pickup:
Local pickup option
Option to bring your own bags with recommended # of bags based on purchase
Option for no utensils or napkins with order
Ability to inspect products and swap out at pickup if the quality is not up to standards
Comparitive Analysis
To ensure the user experience on TenIchi’s web was aligned with Nielson’s usability heuristic #4 of consistency and standards (heuristics = broad rules of thumb for design), I begin to examine delivery and pickup order flows on competitor’s websites.
Task 1: To evaluate the process of finding an item without using search, adding it to the cart, and scheduling a delivery, I created the following task: “Imagine you’re cooking dinner and you realize you’re out of rice. Use the website to locate white rice, add it to your basket, and have it delivered to your home”.
Task 2: To evaluate the process of finding an item without using search, adding it to the cart, and scheduling a pickup, I created the following task: “Imagine you’re cooking dinner and you realize you’re out of rice. Use the website to locate white rice, add it to your basket, and select a time to pick it up at the store”.
Key Findings:
Each flow had about the same amount of steps for each task between vendors
Login/Register was introduced at different points
The Fresh Market allows you to directly add a product to the cart and select a quantity from the search results whereas Whole Foods requires you to to go the product page to select the quantity.
Only one vendor had a significantly different flow for pickup, which was Target. They invite the user to select pickup BEFORE shopping, as opposed to being part of the checkout process like the other websites.
Cart Sorting
The participants were asked to sort the 50 items, one written on each ‘card’, into as many different categories of their choosing as they liked. I found that there was quite a bit of overlap between the categories each of the 3 users sorted the items into, and this is how I landed on my final categories of: Candy, Snacks, Condiments, Beverages, Noodles, Produce, Frozen, and Ready to Eat.
Sketching & Wireframes
Sketching & Wireframes
Wireframes helped me translate my sketches into a format I could continue iterating upon - adding more detail while ensuring the elements were in scale with the size of the screen.
Prototype Testing
Testing Objectives:
To understand users' impressions of the homepage - what elements are they drawn to and where do they go first?
To determine how users interact with the global navigation & hierarchy of information
To gather user impressions of the product pages & overall design
To identify pain points users might encounter throughout the entire process
View the walkthrough of the pickup order flow below ⇣
Prototype Test Results
All users were successful in finding and adding items to the cart on their first try
Appreciated saved profiles that include all information so nothing needs to be manually input
Overall visual design/branding
Liked pick-up options that eliminated waste
Prototype Test Results [cont’d]
All users noticed the text at the top changed to indicate delivery/pickup, but they expected a more drastic change to the homepage potentially or to be directed to another page. Additionally, the indicator text should be black except for the name of the store and ‘change’ [the portion the user will interact with]
Just For Fun…
Final Thoughts & Next Steps
Due to time restraints, I was only able to conduct one usability test, which was using the higher fidelity prototype. In the future, I would prefer to conduct a test on the lower fidelity wireframes as well to detect any problems that should be resolved earlier in the process.
In the end, the final product is a huge improvement over the current state and the design brings life/appeal to the brand while offering the usability and features users requested.
Next Steps
Conduct 2nd usability test on high fidelity prototype
Complete UI & interaction for ‘My Account’
Complete UI & interaction for order tracking
Reconsider the visual feedback for when a user selects ‘delivery’ vs ‘pickup’